From e926e7d1a94d3d3bb61af5793b2d0654a908f21a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keir Fraser Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 09:50:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] xenpm: remove wrong and pointless "current" indicator Using the CPU number to compare with an index into an array containing only a subset of CPUs isn't valid. And indicator isn't necessary here at all since the CPU number being dealt with gets printed right before this line. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- tools/misc/xenpm.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/misc/xenpm.c b/tools/misc/xenpm.c index 19a6e2f2ba..d92ff2ad8a 100644 --- a/tools/misc/xenpm.c +++ b/tools/misc/xenpm.c @@ -499,10 +499,7 @@ static void print_cpufreq_para(int cpuid, struct xc_get_cpufreq_para *p_cpufreq) printf("affected_cpus :"); for ( i = 0; i < p_cpufreq->cpu_num; i++ ) - if ( i == cpuid ) - printf(" *%d", p_cpufreq->affected_cpus[i]); - else - printf(" %d", p_cpufreq->affected_cpus[i]); + printf(" %d", p_cpufreq->affected_cpus[i]); printf("\n"); printf("cpuinfo frequency : max [%u] min [%u] cur [%u]\n", -- 2.30.2